ブックタイトル第43回日本集中治療医学会学術集会プログラム・抄録集

概要

第43回日本集中治療医学会学術集会プログラム・抄録集

－167－5. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variable and fluid responsiveness inmechanically ventilated patients: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37:2642-2647.6. Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, sampling duration and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure and stroke volumevariation during positive-pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 2008; 36:2858-2862.7. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002, 121:2000-2008.8. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, et al. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patientsundergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 2001, 92:984-989.9. Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure and cardiac contractility on variations in pulsepressure, stroke volume and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37:1672-1679.10. Lanspa MJ, Grissom CK, Hirshberg EL, et al. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic responses to volumeexpansion in spontaneous breathing patients with septic shock. Shock 2013; 39:155-160.11. Yazigi A, Khoury E, Hlais S, Madi-Jebara S, et al. Pulse Pressure Variation Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Elderly PatientsAfter Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012; 26:387-390.12. Lekhal K, Ehrmann S, Perrotin D, et al. Fluid challenge: tracking changes in cardiac output with blood pressure monitoring（invasive and non-invasive）. Intensive Care Med 2013; 39:1953-1962.13. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:659-663.14. Biais M, Ouattara A, Janvier G, Sztark F. Case Scenario: Respiratory Variations in Arterial Pressure for Guiding FluidManagement in Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Anesthesiology 2012; 116:1354-1361.15. Debacker D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidalvolume. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:517-523.16. Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R,et al. Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predictedby pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med Feb 2009; 37:650-658.17. Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, et al. Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intraabdominalpressure: an experimental study. Crit Care 2011; 15:R33.18. Mahjoub Y, Touzeau J, Airapetian N, et al. The passive leg-raising maneuver cannot accurately predict fluid responsivenessin patients with intra-abdominal hypertension. Crit Care Med 2010; 38:1824-1829.19. Lopes RL, Oliveira MA, Pereira VOS, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoringduring high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007, 11:R100.20. Stagt C, Malagon I, Groeneveld ABJ. Systematic review of uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis to determinecardiac output and stroke volume variation. Brit J Anaesth 2014: aet429.21. Khwannimit B, Bhurayanontachai R. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients: comparing stroke volumevariation by FloTrac/Vigileo and automated pulse pressure variation. Euro J Anaesthiol 2012; 29:64-69.22. Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MMRF, et al. Comparison of arterial pressure and plethysmographic waveform-based dynamicpreload variables in assessing fluid responsiveness and dynamic arterial tone in patients undergoing major hepatic resection. BritJ Anaesth 2013; 110:940-946.23. Monnet X, Anguel N, Jozwiak M, et al. Third-generation FloTrac/Vigileo does not reliably track changes in cardiac outputinduced by norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth 2012: 108:615-622.24. Hatib F, JRC Jansen, Pinsky MR. Peripheral vascular decoupling in porcine endotoxic shock. J Appl Physiol 2011; 111:853-860.25. Marik PE, Levitov A, Young A, Andrews L. The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume